Labor Motivation of Pedagogical Personnel: Comparative Research
Abstract
The urgency of the problem of labor motivation of the teaching staff is confirmed by the increased attention of foreign scientists, as evidenced by the increase in the number of studies on this topic. Teachers should be motivated, their job satisfaction and a positive psychological climate are crucial in achieving high performance for the entire institution. This article analyzed 19 studies of foreign scientists on the topic of labor motivation of teaching staff. The results of scientific research are compared and the analysis is carried out to cover the understanding of the labor motivation of teachers. Our review provided a synthesis of research related to teacher motivation, job satisfaction, and PsyCap. A link was established between the PsyCap indicator and job satisfaction. This analysis can help educational institutions to assess the level of satisfaction of the teaching staff and develop management decisions in the field of work motivation. This literature review is designed to study research related to PsyCap work and teacher motivation, given that both designs play a crucial role in teacher motivation - we expect this review to be useful for developing research work educator motivation and will provide comprehensive knowledge of the relationship between the two most important variables in the organizational field, i. e. work motivation and satisfaction.
About the Author
A. A. Akhtyrskiy
Санкт-Петербургский государственный экономический университет
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Ильин Е. П. Мотивация и мотивы. СПб.: Питер, 2011. 512 с.
2. Потемкин В. К. Управление персоналом: учебник для вузов. СПб.: Питер; Лидер, 2010. 432 с.
3. Gomes D., Borba D. Motivação no trabalho [Work motivation] / D. Gomes (Coord.). Psicologia das organizações, do trabalho e dos recursos humanos [Psychology of the organizations, work, and human resources]. Coimbra: Coimbra University Press, 2011. P. 243-319.
4. Jesus S. N., Lens W. An integrated model for the study of teacher motivation. Applied Psychology // International Review. 2005. Vol. 54. P. 119-134.
5. Mueller F., Hanfstingl B. Teacher motivation [Special issue editorial] // Journal of Educational Research Online. 2010. Vol. 2. P. 5-8.
6. Santisi G., Magnano P., Hichy Z., Ramaci T. Metacognitive strategies and work motivation in teachers: фn empirical study // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Science. 2014. Vol. 116. P. 1227-1231.
7. Jesus S. N. A motivação para a profissão docente [Teacher motivation]. Aveiro, Portugal: Estante Editora. 1996.
8. Aloe A., Shisler S., Norris B., Nickerson A., Rinker T. A multivariate meta-analysis of student misbehavior and teacher burnout // Educational Research Review. 2014. Vol. 12. P. 30-44.
9. Jesus S. N. La motivation de los profesores: Una revisión de la literature [Teacher motivation: A literature review] / D. García-Villamisar, T. Freixas Guingona (Eds.), El estrés del profesorado [Teachers’ stress]. 2003. P. 119-139.
10. Lambert R., McCarthy C. (eds.).Understanding teacher stress in an age of ac-countability. Greenwich, CT: Age Publishing, 2006.
11. Judge T., Kammeyer-Mueller J. Job attitudes // Annual Review of Psychology. 2012. Vol. 63. P. 341-367.
12. Dalal R., Baysing M., Brummel B., LeBreton J. The relative importance of em-ployee engagement, other job attitudes, and trait affect as predictors of job performance // Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2012. Vol. 42(S1). E295-E325.
13. Hongying S. Literature review of teacher job satisfaction // Chinese Education & Society, 2007. Vol. 40. P. 11-16.
14. Luthans F., Youssef C., Avolio B. Psychological capital: Developing the human. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 2007.
15. Luthans F., Youssef-Morgan C., Avolio B. Psychological capital and beyond. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 2015.
16. Siu O., Bakker A., Jiang X. Psychological capital among university students: Re-lationships with study engagement and intrinsic motivation // Journal of Happiness Studies. 2014. Vol. 15. P. 979-994.
17. Gagné M., Deci E. Self-determination theory and work motivation // Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2005. Vol. 26. P. 331-362.
18. Yu X., Wang P., Zhai X., Dai H., Yang Q. The effect of work stress on job burnout among teachers: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Social Indicators Re-search. Advance online publication. 2014.
19. Green C., Heywood J. Does performance pay increase job satisfaction // Economic. 2008. Vol. 75. P. 710-728.
20. Marsden D., French S., Kubo K. Does performance pay de-motivate, and does it matter. London, UK: Centre for Economic Performance, 2001.
21. Glisson C., Durick M. Predictors of jobsatisfaction and organizational commitment in human service organizations // Administrative Quarterly. 1988. Vol. 33. P. 61-81.
22. Vink J., Outened E., LeBlanc P. Psychological resources for engaged employ-ees: Psychological capital in the job demands-resources model // Gedrag & Organization-e. 2011. Vol. 24. P. 101-120.
23. Avey J., Reichard R., Luthans F., Mhatre K. Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance: human competitive edge. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, Resource Development Quarterly, 2011. Vol. 22. P. 127-152.
Review
For citations:
Akhtyrskiy A.A. Labor Motivation of Pedagogical Personnel: Comparative Research. Sociology and Law. 2019;(1):55-64. (In Russ.)
Views:
189
Email this article 