Landscape Opportunities and Preferences for Choosing Recreational Places of Megalopolis Residents (on Example of St. Petersburg)
https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2019-3-13-23
Abstract
A resident of a large city is increasingly in need of a complete rest in the bosom of nature, enjoy the peace and beauty of landscapes. The administration of megacities is concerned about the problems of preserving the natural environment and creating within the city limits a network of recreational areas where recreational activities can be organized. The necessity and importance of establishing a network of specially protected natural areas within the metropolis is not in doubt. But the status of the created nature reserves implies, for the most part, prohibitions and restrictions for the organization of recreational activities. A detailed description of recreational opportunities for the rational use of individual components of the city’s natural environment is presented. The authors conducted a geoecological analysis of the allocation of recreational areas in large cities. Features of nature that should be considered when designing recreational areas in large cities, on example of St. Petersburg, are noted.
About the Authors
V. L. Pogodina
Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет промышленных технологий и дизайна
Russian Federation
Bol’shaya Morskaya St. 18, St. Petersburg, 191186; (812) 315-75-25
Russian Federation
Bol’shaya Morskaya St. 18, St. Petersburg, 191186; (812) 315-75-25
A. S. Matveevskaya
Санкт-Петербургский государственный университет
Russian Federation
Universitetskaya Emb. 7–9, St. Petersburg, 199034; (812) 326-4963
Russian Federation
Universitetskaya Emb. 7–9, St. Petersburg, 199034; (812) 326-4963
I. G. Filippova
Санкт-Петербургский университет технологий управления и экономики
Russian Federation
Lermontovskiy Ave 44/А, St. Petersburg, 190103; (812) 449-81-76
Russian Federation
Lermontovskiy Ave 44/А, St. Petersburg, 190103; (812) 449-81-76
References
1. Schirru M. R. Montalto di Castro, Sustainable tourism as an opportunity for urban and environmental regeneration. (Conference Paper), 2018, pp. 645–653. DOI: 10.1007/9783-319-92102-0_70.
2. Nikolaeva J. V., Bogoliubova N. M., Shirin S. S. Ecological tourism in the state image policy structure. Experience and problems of modern Russia. Current Issues in Tourism. Vol. 21, Issue 5, 2018, pp. 547−566 DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2015.1100588.
3. The Federal target program “Development internal and entrance tourism in Russian Federation (2019−2025)”, available at: URL: https://www.russiatourism.ru (Accessed 5 May 2019).
4. Slater S. J., Tarlov E., Jones K., Matthewa S. A., Wing C., Zenk S. N. Would increasing access to recreational places promote healthier weights and a healthier nation? Health and Place, Vol. 56, 2019, pp. 127−134. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.01.013.
5. Official website of World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), available at: URL: http:// unwto.org/ru (Accessed 26 June 2019).
6. Official website of Russian Federal Agency for Tourism, available at: URL: https://www. russiatourism.ru/ (Accessed 26 June 2019).
7. Matveevskaya A., Pogodina V., Ermolina M. Geoecological approach to the design of recreational areas in large cities. MATEC Web of Conferences, Vol. 265, 2019. DOI:10.1051/ matecconf/201926506012.
8. Paranina A. Archaeological objects as elements of informational life support system and sources of information about the evolution of the environment. International Journal of GEOMATE, Vol. 13, Issue 35, 2017, pp. 100−107. DOI: 10.21660/2017.35.6722.
9. Stefănica M., Butnaru G. I. Research on tourists’ perception of the relationship between tourism and environment. Procedia Economics and Finance. 2015, pp. 595−600.
10. Matveevskaya A. S., Pogodina V. L, Tarakanova T. S., Evseev V. V., Nesterova I. E. Technologies of Tourism in the Modern Urban Environment. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET) Vol. 9, Issue 10, 2018. pp. 1566−1574.
11. Paranina A. N., Paranin R. V. Information in geographical space as the basis of crossdisciplinary researches in culture geography. European Journal of Geography, No. 8 (3), 2017. pp. 67−77.
12. Baranov A. S., Drapeko E. G., Bogdanov E. I. World Heritage of St. Petersburg in the context of cultural tourism, 2011, pp. 42−48.
13. Pozdeeva E. G., Trostinskaya I. R., Evseeva L. I., Ivanova R. A. Problems of personality type transformation in current conditions of Russian society. International conference on research paradigms transformation in social sciences (RPTSS 2017) European Proceedings of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35, pp. 1092−1099. DOI: 10.15405/epsbs.2018.02.128.
14. Shipunova O. D., Kolomeitsev I. V. Sociotechnical system and socio-cultural environment in modern society. Scientific and technical statements, No. 1 (105), 2010, pp. 15−21.
15. The Geography of Tourism of Central and Eastern European Countries. K. Widawski, J. Wyrzykowski (Ed.) 2017, P. 551. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42205-3.
16. Pogodina V., Filippova I. Geography of Tourism, 2015, P. 256.
17. Matveevskaya A., Pogodina V. New objects of tourist interest and their reflection in the register of tourist resources of St. Petersburg. Tourism and Education, 2017, pp. 44−50.
18. Belkina I., Pogodina V. Eco-recreational features of Leningrad region’ landscape. Geology and evolutionary geography, 2003, pp. 156−166.
19. Grigoriev A., Zelyutkina L., Isachenko T., Korostelev E., Paranina A., Sevastiyanov D. The Heritage of the North-West of Russia and recreational environment management, 2013, P. 152.
20. Gaidai A., Pogodina V. Features of the design of ecological trails in protected areas of St. Petersburg. Natural and cultural heritage, 2016, pp. 440−445.
21. Nutsford D., Pearson A. L., Kingham S. An ecological study investigating the association between access to urban green space and mental health. Public Health, Vol. 127, Issue 11, 2013, pp. 1005−1011. DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2013.08.016.
22. Problems of development of domestic and inbound tourism in Russian Federation, 2018, P. 223.
23. Thongdejsri M., Nitivattananon V. Assessing impacts of implementing low-carbon tourism program for sustainable tourism in a world heritage city. Tourism Review, Vol. 74, Issue 2, 2019, pp. 138−156. DOI: 10.1108/TR-04-2017-0082.
24. Kovnova T., Koleva V., Dragoeva A. P., Natchev N. Peri-urban national parks as green spaces for recreation: A case study of nature park Shumen plateau. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, Vol. 10, Issue 1, 2019, pp. 46−58. DOI: 10.4018/IJSESD.2019010104.
Review
For citations:
Pogodina V.L., Matveevskaya A.S., Filippova I.G. Landscape Opportunities and Preferences for Choosing Recreational Places of Megalopolis Residents (on Example of St. Petersburg). Sociology and Law. 2019;(3):13-23. https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2019-3-13-23
Views:
613
Email this article 