Measures ensuring administrative proceedings in the system of administrative coercion
https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2023-1-115-121
Abstract
In the study, the problems of interim measures ensuring administrative proceedings were considered. Currently, this issue is of particular relevance, since both the scientific community and law enforcement practice lack a common understanding of the essence and legal nature of these measures. Various categories of measures to ensure administrative proceedings were characterized, and the main approaches to the definition of this concept and its understanding were highlighted. Measures of administrative coercion were divided into groups, with descriptions of typical features and peculiarities.
About the Authors
D. I. Ignatenko
Luga Institute (branch) of Leningrad State University named after A.S. Pushkin
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. I. Ignatenko — Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor at the Department of Law
52A Volodarskogo Ave., Luga, Leningrad region, 188230
D. N. Shartava
St. Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
D. N. Shartava — postgraduate student at the Department of Administrative Law and Process
44A Lermontovskiy Ave., St. Petersburg 190103
References
1. Kolyazina A.V. Measures of maintenance of proceedings on affairs about administrative offences, applicable by state control and supervision bodies in the sphere of housing and communal services. Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn’. 2017;(2):139-143. (In Russ.).
2. Kolyazina A.V. Administrative restraint measures applied by the state control and supervision bodies in the housing and utilities sphere and their officials. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii = Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin. 2018; (1):116-122. (In Russ.).
3. Osyak A.N., Novichkova E.E., Tsviliy A.V. Protective measures of legal proceedings on administrative violations. Yurist-Pravoved. 2020;(4):150-155. (In Russ.).
4. Rossinskii B.V., Starilov Yu.N. Administrative law. Moscow: Norma; Infra-M; 2010. 926 p. (In Russ.).
5. Telegin A.S. Administrative and procedural enforcement measures: Some of the application issues. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Yuridicheskie nauki = Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2014;(1):60-67. (In Russ.).
6. Sokolov A.Yu., Popov V.V. Provision procedure measure of administrative offences cases: Concept and features. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii = Saratov State Law Academy Bulletin. 2012;(6):72-79. (In Russ.).
7. Korkin A.V. Procedurality as a characteristic of measures for ensuring the proceedings in cases concerning administrative offenses. Yuridicheskaya nauka i pravookhranitel’naya praktika = Legal Science and Law Enforcement Practice. 2017;(4):37-42. (In Russ.).
8. Grishin D.A. Some questions of legal regulation and the mechanism of realization of measures of proceedings provision on affairs of administrative offences committed by the penal officials. Chelovek: prestuplenie i nakazanie = Man: Crime and Punishment. 2012;(2): 92-95. (In Russ.).
9. Meshkov P.V. On the issue of the concept of measures to ensure proceedings in cases of administrative offenses. Innovatsionnaya nauka = Innovation Science. 2018;(6): 113-115. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Ignatenko D.I., Shartava D.N. Measures ensuring administrative proceedings in the system of administrative coercion. Sociology and Law. 2023;15(1):115-121. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2023-1-115-121
Views:
271
Email this article 