Preview

Sociology and Law

Advanced search

International legal and economic aspects of joint use of the Paz River hydro-resources by the USSR, Finland and Norway in the 1920–1940s

https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2023-4-554-564

Abstract

The article deals with the fact that international legal relations of joint use of hydro resources of border rivers by Soviet Russia, Finland and Norway in 1920–1944 is an understudied topic among domestic and foreign researchers. This is largely due to the fact that the international legal interaction between the countries was contradictory, and the problems of security of border territories caused concern and could not create normal conditions for regional economic cooperation in this area.

About the Authors

Yu. V. Mishalchenko
St. Petersburg University of Management TechnoSt. Petersburg Institute (branch) All-Russian State University of Justice (RLA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)logies and Economics; St. Petersburg State Marine Technical University
Russian Federation

Yu. V. Mishalchenko — Doctor of Law, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Professor at the Department of Constitutional and International Law of UMTE; Professor at the Department of Constitutional and International Law; Professor at the Department of State and International Law of SMTU

44A Lermontovskiy Ave., St. Petersburg 190020, Russia

19а, 10 line V.O., St. Petersburg 199178, Russia

3 Lotsmanskaya st., St. Petersburg 190121, Russia



Ya. A. Sekste
St. Petersburg Institute (branch) All-Russian State University of Justice (RLA of the Ministry of Justice of Russia)
Russian Federation

Ya. A. Sekste — PhD in Historical Sciences, Associate Professor,
Head of the Department of Humanitarian and Socio-Economic Disciplines

19а, 10 line V.O., St. Petersburg 199178, Russia



References

1. Karelin V. The problem of Pasvik border river hydropower resources exploitation and Russian-Norwegian border cooperation: First steps, 1906-1913. Al’manakh severoevropeiskikh i baltiiskikh issledovanii = Nordic and Baltic Studies Review. 2022;(7):117-139. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15393/j103.art.2022.2364

2. Panin A.P., ed. Hydropower resources of the Kola Peninsula and the basic principles of their use. Moscow, Leningrad: USSR Academy of Sciences Publ.; 1960;(3). 146 p. (In Russ.).

3. Letter from Deputy People’s Commissar for Foreign Affairs of the USSR M.M. Litvinov to the plenipotentiary representative of the USSR in Norway A.M. Makar about Soviet policy towards Norway. May 18, 1926. In: Soviet-Norwegian relations 1917-1955: Coll. doc. Moscow: ELIA-ART-O; 1997. (Archive of Russian Foreign Policy. Fund 05. Invent.

4. Folder 12. File 92. Sheet 10-13). URL: http://docs.historyrussia.org/ru/nodes/135822-pismo-zamestitelya-narodnogo-komissara-inostrannyh-del-sssr-m-m-litvinova-polnomochnomupredstavitelyu-sssr-v-norvegii-a-m-makaru-o-sovetskoy-politike-v-otnoshenii-norvegii-18-maya-1926-g (In Russ.).

5. Kasiyan A.S. The Spitsbergen issue in Russian-Norwegian relations (1870s-1953). Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya: gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki = Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series: Humanitarian and Social Sciences. 2013;(1):16-22. (In Russ.).

6. Kutilova L.A. The Soviet-Finnish War and the problems of Eastern Karelia in relationship of Finland and Soviet Russia in 1918-1923 years. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta = Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin. 2013;(7): 25-34. (In Russ.).

7. Rupasov A.I., Chistikov A.N. Soviet-Finnish border, 1918-1938: Essays on history. St. Petersburg: Evropeiskii dom; 2007. 221 p. (In Russ.).

8. Vinter A.V., Krzhizhanovskii G.M., Lomov G.I., eds. Atlas of energy resources of the USSR. Vol. 1 (In 3 pts.). Pt. 1. Moscow, Leningrad: State Energy Publ.; 1935. 48 p. (In Russ.).

9. Livshits S.A., Gabbasova E.I. Economic aspects of the realization of Russian electrification project in the 1920s. Ekonomika i biznes: teoriya i praktika = Economy and Business: Theory and Practice. 2017;(11):107-109. (In Russ.).

10. The first Leningrad Energy Congress took place. 1930. Museum of the History of Energy of the North-West. URL: http://www.energomuseum.ru/timeline/plan-goehlro/sostojalsjapervyi-leningradskii-ehnergeticheskii-sezd/ (accessed on 18.02.2023). (In Russ.).

11. Stets A.I. Murmashi — a warrior and a hard worker. 2009. History of Murmashi. URL: https://murmashilive.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=46&Itemid=60 (accessed on 18.02.2023). (In Russ.).

12. Loginov D.I. Large work plans. Polyarnaya pravda. Jan. 01, 1938. P. 3. (In Russ.).

13. Poznyakov V.Ya. Severonickel: Pages of the history of the Severonickel plant. Moscow: Ruda i metally; 1999. 432 p. (In Russ.).

14. Kotomin A.B. Electricity generation as a base for economic development of Murman: Historical retrospective. Vestnik Kol’skogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN = Herald of the Kola Science Centre RAS. 2011;(4):95-103. (In Russ.).

15. Otrokova O.Yu., Shcherbakova O.M. The GOELRO plan is the program of revolutionary Russia. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul’turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki = Historical, Philosophical, Political and Law Sciences, Culturology and Study of Art. Issues of Theory and Practice. 2017;(10-1):129-135. (In Russ.).

16. The Pasvik river: One river — three states. The Water without Borders. URL: https://www.pasvikelva.no/en (accessed on 08.10.2023).

17. Lähteenmäki M., Colpaert A. Memory politics in transition: Nostalgia tours and gilded memories of Petsamo. Matkailututkimus = Finnish Journal of Tourism Research. 2020;16(1):8-34. DOI: 10.33351/mt.85341

18. Lähteenmäki M. Bad blood and humiliation: Finn’s experiences of the Moscow peace negotiations in 1940. Nordia Geographical Publications. 2014;43(1):101-113. URL: https://nordia.journal.fi/article/view/65103/26253 (accessed on 08.10.2023).

19. Rowe L. Russia is interested in the Petsamo nickel. The Journal of Slavic Military Studies. 2020;33(1):113-135. DOI: 10.1080/13518046.2020.1723235

20. Elloranta J., Nummela I. Finnish nickel as strategic metal, 1920-1944. Scandinavian Journal of History. 2007;32(4):322-345. DOI: 10.1080/03468750701747528

21. Baryshnikov N.I. Russia and Finland in the 18th-20th centuries. Specifics of the border. On the issue of the “strategic borders” of Finland. St. Petersburg: Evropeiskii dom; 1999. 362 p. (In Russ.).

22. Leibenzon G.A. Nickel of the Kola land. Murmansk: Murmansk Book Publ.; 2008. 136 p. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Mishalchenko Yu.V., Sekste Ya.A. International legal and economic aspects of joint use of the Paz River hydro-resources by the USSR, Finland and Norway in the 1920–1940s. Sociology and Law. 2023;15(4):554-564. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2023-4-554-564

Views: 138


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2219-6242 (Print)