Renovation in St. Petersburg as a field of power-civil relations: Approaches to analysis
https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2024-1-75-83
Abstract
The article is focused on the analysis of the reaction of the population of St. Peters burg as a field of power-civic relations. A comprehensive approach is used, including both the tools of sociology of social movements and the model of citizens’ behavior in the space of normative coordinates. Attention is paid to the inconsistency of the adopted legislation. Emphasis is placed on the use of digital platforms to coordinate protest activity and protect their personal space.
About the Author
E. P. Evdokimova
Sociological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences — a branch of the Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena P. Evdokimova, research
Sector of Socio-Urban Studies
190005; 25/14 7th Krasnoarmeyskaya st.; St. Petersburg
References
1. Tykanova E.V., Khokhlova A.M. Alignments in social movement fields: The construction of small and large-scaled performance outcomes. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii = The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2023;26(2):175-196. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31119/jssa.2023.26.2.8
2. Zhelnina A.A. “Ghetto in a good sense” versus “the concrete ghetto”: Neighborhood discourses and renovation in Moscow. Gorodskie issledovaniya i praktiki = Urban Studies and Practices. 2019;4(2):21-36. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/usp42202021-36
3. Zhelnina A. Bring your own politics: Life strategies and mobilization in response to urban redevelopment. Sociology. 2022;56(4):783-799. DOI: 10.1177/00380385211059438
4. Morris J., Zhelnina A. The river of urban resistance: Renovation and new civic infrastructures in Moscow. In: Morris J., Semenov A., Smyth R., eds. Varieties of Russian activism: State-society contestation in everyday life. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 2023:120-142. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv37scft2.11
5. Eremicheva G.V., ed. Social space of a big city. St. Petersburg: Sociological Institute of RAS — branch of the Federal Research Sociological Center of RAS; 2018. 392 p. (In Russ.).
6. Evdokimova E.P. Everyday life of the population of a large city in a normative dimension: Practices of bypassing urban institutionalized norms and rules. Sotsiologiya i pravo = Sociology and Law. 2022;14(4):428-435. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.35854/2219-6242-2022-4-428-435
7. Levchenko I.A. Value-normative regulation of social processes: what is and what should be. Gumanitarnye, sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie i obshchestvennye nauki = Humanities, Social-Economic and Social Sciences. 2014;(8):34-37. (In Russ.).
8. Pokrovskaya N. Social norms as an object of sociological analysis. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noi antropologii = The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. 2007;10(1): 190-198. (In Russ.).
9. Ross L., Nisbett R.E. The person and the situation: Perspectives of social psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Co.; 1991. 286 p. (Russ. ed.: Ross L., Nisbett R. Chelovek i situatsiya. Uroki sotsial’noi psikhologii. Moscow: Aspekt Press; 1999. 429 p.).
10. Heckhausen H. Entwicklungslinien der Motivationsforschung. In: Heckhausen H. Motivation und Handeln. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1980:13-48. (Russ. ed.: Heckhausen H. Issledovaniya motivatsii: tochki zreniya, problemy, eksperimental’nye plany. In: Heckhausen H. Motivatsiya i deyatel’nost’. In 2 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow: Pedagogika; 1986:15-33.).
11. Ilyina I.N. Quality of urban environment as a factor of sustainable community development. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii = Property Relations in the Russian Federation. 2015;(5):69-82. (In Russ.).
12. Beck U. Risikogesellschaft. Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag; 1986. 396 p. (Russ. ed.: Beck U. Obshchestvo riska. Na puti k drugomu modernu. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya; 2000. 384 p.).
13. Eremicheva G.V. Development of urban space through housing construction and housing policy: Retrospective and prospective analysis. In: Eremicheva G.V., ed. Social space of a big city. St. Petersburg: Sociological Institute of RAS — branch of the Federal Research Sociological Center of RAS; 2018:105-146. (In Russ.).
14. Khrupin K.G. Participation of the Academy of Construction and Architecture of the USSR in the implementation of housing reform in the 1950<sup>s</sup>-60<sup>s</sup>. Arkhitektura i stroitel’stvo Rossii = Architecture and Construction of Russia. 2012;(10):24-30. (In Russ.).
15. Korbat I. The city is against renovation 2.0: A month and a half, and the authorities are putting the law on pause. Fontanka.ru. Sep. 13, 2022. URL: https://www.fontanka.ru/2022/09/13/71652083/ (accessed on 12. 12. 2023). (In Russ.).
16. Zolotonosov M. Deportation from panel houses. Myths of bosses and the truth of life. Gorod 812. Aug. 15, 2022. URL: https://gorod-812.ru/deportacziya-iz-panelnyh-domov-mify-nachalnikov-i-pravda-zhizni/ (accessed on 13. 11. 2023). (In Russ.).
17. Korbat I. “Peter against the house on the edge”. How the city is preparing to protect Khrushchev buildings from renovation. Fontanka.ru. Jul. 21, 2022. URL: https://www.fontanka.ru/2022/07/21/71505401/ (accessed on 12. 12. 2023). (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Evdokimova E.P. Renovation in St. Petersburg as a field of power-civil relations: Approaches to analysis. Sociology and Law. 2024;16(1):75-83. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2024-1-75-83
Views:
287
Email this article 