|Generate QR code
Open Access
Subscription Access
Disclosure of testimony in the presence of substantial controversy
https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2025-1-96-106
Abstract
The article examines the institution of reading out testimony of participants in criminal proceedings in the presence of contradictions between the testimony given by the process participant and that given previously in court or at the pre-trial stage. The work presents the historical analysis of the process of generating the principle of immediacy of criminal proceedings in Russia and the principle of free assessment of evidence. A comparative legal analysis of the regulation of the institution of disclosure of previously given testimony in the USA, Germany, and Russia is performed in order to assess the influence of the criminal process model on the procedure for reading out previously given testimony. The authors concluded that the use of the wording “substantial controversy” in the norms of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (CPC RF), regulating the procedure for reading out testimony, creates uncertainty in practice while not being an adequate guarantee of ensuring equality of participants in criminal proceedings and the adversarial principle. In this regard, the authors propose a version of changes to the current regulation
About the Authors
V. V. Petrov
St. Petersburg State University; Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vadim V. Petrov - PhD in Medicine, senior lecturer at the Department of Process and Criminalistics (SPbU); Associate Professor at the Department of Forensic Medicine and Jurisprudence (Pavlov University)
K. D. Tsvetkova
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kseniia D. Tsvetkova - advocate, 2 st year master’s student Faculty of Law
References
1. Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Federal Law of December 18, 2001 No. 174-FZ (as amended on November 9, 2024). Konsul’tantPlyus. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_34481/ (accessed on 25.11.2024). (In Russ).
2. Gernet M.N., ed. The statute of criminal procedure: A systematic commentary. Iss. 4. Art. 595-764. Moscow: M.M. Ziva Publ.; 1915. 1278 p. (In Russ.).
3. Verdict of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) of April 3, 2023 in case No. 2-5/2023. Supreme Court of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) official website. URL: http://vs.jak.sudrf.ru (accessed on 20.11.2024). (In Russ.).
4. Verdict of the Zherdevsky District Court of the Tambov Region dated August 20, 2024 in case No. 1-62/2024. Zherdevsky District Court of the Tambov Region. URL: http://zherdevsky.tmb.sudrf.ru (accessed on 20.11.2024). (In Russ.).
5. Verdict of the Neryungri City Court of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) dated May 23, 2024 in case No. 1-71/2024. Neryungri City Court of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). URL: http://nerungry.jak.sudrf.ru (accessed on 20.11.2024). (In Russ.).
6. Verdict of the Perm District Court of Perm Krai dated April 8, 2024 in case No. 1-118/ 2024. Perm District Court of Perm Krai. URL: http://permsk.perm.sudrf.ru (accessed on 20.11.2024). (In Russ.).
7. Verdict of the Primorsky District Court of St. Petersburg dated March 11, 2022 in case No. 1-85/2022. Primorsky District Court of St. Petersburg. URL: primorsky.spb.sudrf.ru (accessed on 20.11.2024). (In Russ.).
8. Cassation ruling of the Judicial Collegium for military cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated July 4, 2023 No. 222-UD23-39-A6. Laws, Codes and Regulatory Legal Acts of the Russian Federation. URL: https://legalacts.ru/sud/kassatsionnoe-opredelenie-sudebnoi-kollegii-po-delam-voennosluzhashchikh-verkhovnogo-suda-rossiiskoi-federatsii-ot-04072023-n-222-ud23-39-a6/?ysclid=m67m5fg6rg7 (accessed on 20.11.2024). (In Russ.).
9. Determination of the Judicial Collegium for criminal cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated July 7, 2022 No. 53-UD22-16-A5. Konsul’tantPlyus. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ARB&n=722221#HpnsaaU8xiHGdxPt (accessed on 25.11.2024). (In Russ.).
10. Cassation ruling of the Judicial Collegium for criminal cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated January 12, 2023 No. 49-UD22-41-K6. Laws, Codes and Regulatory Legal Acts of the Russian Federation. URL: https://legalacts.ru/sud/kassatsionnoe-opredelenie-sudebnoi-kollegii-po-ugolovnym-delam-verkhovnogo-suda-rossiiskoi-federatsii-ot-12012023-n-49-ud22-41-k6/?ysclid=m67m8kve8s430657627 (accessed on 25.11.2024). (In Russ.).
11. Determination of the Judicial Collegium for criminal cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated June 28, 2022 No. 18-UD22-32SP-A3. Konsul’tantPlyus. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ARB&n=721017&ysclid=m67m9u0xij380380473#GyItaaUXZUr4xCkM (accessed on 25.11.2024). (In Russ.).
12. The Charter of criminal procedure of November 20, 1864. Garant.ru. URL: https://constitution.garant.ru/history/act1600-1918/3137/ (accessed on 25.11.2024). (In Russ.).
13. Vinitskaya Yu.L. On the concept of directness in criminal proceeding. Vestnik Yuzhno Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pravo = Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Law. 2016;16(1):35-43. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.14529/law160106
14. Foinitskii I.Ya. Criminal procedure course. 3rd ed. In 2 vols. Vol. 2. St. Petersburg: Senate Print.; 1910. 572 p. (In Russ.).
15. Pechnikov G.A., Solovyeva N.A., Shinkaruk V.M. The Charter of Criminal Trial of 1864 — radical transition from formal to objective (material) truth and actual problems of truth in the modern Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya 5. Yurisprudentsiya. 2015;(1):42-48. (In Russ.).
16. On the approval of the Criminal Procedure Code of the RSFSR (together with the “Criminal Procedure Code of the RSFSR”). Resolution of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee of February 15, 1923. Konsul’tantPlyus. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ESU&n=3551#GZ8sAVU2UeI6Cgn8 (accessed on 25.11.2024). (In Russ.).
17. Criminal Procedure Code of the RSFSR. Approved by the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR on October 27, 1960 (as amended on December 29, 2001, with amendments on November 26, 2002). Konsul’tantPlyus. URL: https://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_3275/ (accessed on 25.11.2024). (In Russ.).
18. Stoiko N.G., Semukhina O.B. Criminal procedure in the USA: A textbook. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State University; 2000. 315 p. (In Russ.).
19. Firestone T. Comparative analysis of the legal status of the defendant’s testimony in the criminal procedure legislation of the USA and the Russian Federation. Biznes v zakone = Business in Law. 2007;(4):152-157. (In Russ.).
20. Stoiko N.G. Criminal procedure in Western states and Russia: A comparative theoretical and legal study of the Anglo-American and Romano-Germanic legal systems. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg State University Publ.; Faculty of Law, St. Petersburg State University; 2006. 264 p. (In Russ.).
21. Beulke W. Strafprozessrecht. Heildelberg: C.F. Müller Verlag; 2002. 440 p. (Russ. ed.: Beulke W. Ugolovno-protsessual’noe pravo FRG. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarsk State University; 2004. 351 p.).
22. Golovnenkov P., Spitsa N. Code of criminal procedure of the Federal Republic of Germany — Strafprozessordnung (StPO): Scientific and practical commentary and translation of the text of the law. Potsdam: University of Potsdam; 2012. 408 p. (In Russ.).
23. On the refusal to accept for consideration the complaint of citizen Tatyana Vladimirovna Eloshvili regarding the violation of her constitutional rights by a number of provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation dated December 20, 2018 No. 3395-O. Garant.ru. URL: https://base.garant.ru/72171790/?ysclid=m67mb0ymur902903641 (accessed on 25.11.2024). (In Russ.).
24. Popov D.V. Reading out the testimony of witnesses and victims in court. In: Lazareva V.A., ed. Actual problems of modern criminal procedure in Russia: Inter-univ. coll. sci. pap. Iss. 2. Samara: Samara State University Publ.; 2007:292-300. (In Russ.).
25.
Review
For citations:
Petrov V.V., Tsvetkova K.D. Disclosure of testimony in the presence of substantial controversy. Sociology and Law. 2025;17(1):96-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2025-1-96-106
Views:
52
Email this article 