

Liability for violation of competition rules in entrepreneurial activity: Criminal and administrative aspects
https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2024-4-573-581
Abstract
According to the author’s standpoint, antitrust rules are aimed at promoting fair competition, preventing monopolies, and protecting consumers. They ensure a level playing field in entrepreneurial environment. Among other things, compliance with legislation regulating competitive relations is enforced through state coercion measures. The article argues that one of the pressing issues of modern jurisprudence is the study of the administrative and criminal aspects of liability for violation of competition rules, considering relevant circumstances. It analyzes the systemic relationship between antitrust violation proceedings, administrative infractions, and criminal offenses. The study emphases the legislator’s imperative regulation of the sequence of coercive measures applied in cases of competition rule violations. The author proposes a perspective on determining the moment an anticompetitive offense is detected, particularly for calculating reverse fines. The possibility of combining administrative and jurisdictional proceedings with criminal proceedings into a single judicial process is also explored. Given that the economy digitalization creates a new model of competition, it is proposed to introduce as an aggravating circumstance the commission of an anticompetitive action on a digital platform or using algorithms or artificial intelligence
About the Authors
A. Yu. AntonovRussian Federation
Anatoliy Yu. Antonov, postgraduate student
44A Lermontovskiy Ave., St. Petersburg 190020
V. V. Alekseev
Russian Federation
Vladimir V. Alekseev, postgraduate student
44A Lermontovskiy Ave., St. Petersburg 190020
M. A. Syrova
Russian Federation
Mariya A. Syrova, lecturer at the Department of Criminal Law and Procedure
44A Lermontovskiy Ave., St. Petersburg 190020
References
1. Dekhtyar’ I.N. Proceedings on cases of violations of antimonopoly legislation as a type of administrative-jurisdictional proceedings. Cand. legal sci. diss. Saratov: Saratov State Law Academy; 2018. 275 p. (In Russ.).
2. Senicheva M.O. Administrative liability in the sphere of antimonopoly regulation: Study of compositions, features and development trends. Otechestvennaya yurisprudentsiya. 2020;(2):46-55. (In Russ.).
3. Titov E.E. Administrative liability for violations of antimonopoly legislation. Cand. legal sci. diss. Ekaterinburg: Ural State Law University; 2015. 250 p. (In Russ.).
4. Danilovskaia A.V. Unfair competition: Problems of criminalization of acts and differentiation of responsibility for their commission. Yuridicheskie issledovaniya = Legal Research. 2024;(4):23-48. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.25136/2409-7136.2024.4.70454
5. Kinev A.Yu. Administrative responsibility for antimonopoly legislation violations. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina (MGYuA) = Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). 2014;(2):120-129. (In Russ.).
6. Morozova N. Individual circumstances of administrative responsibility for offences of antimonopoly legislation. Sovremennaya konkurentsiya = Journal of Modern Competition. 2014;(5):48-59. (In Russ.).
7. Kubantsev S.P. Ratio and connection of administrative and criminal liability for violation of competition rules. Zhurnal zarubezhnogo zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniya = Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law. 2019;(2):104-108. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.12737/art.2019.2.14
8. Anikeenko Yu.B., Novoselova N.V. On the conception of administrative-tort legislation development. Elektronnoe prilozhenie k “Rossiiskomu yuridicheskomu zhurnalu” = Electronic Supplement to “Russian Juridical Journal”. 2019;(5):50-56. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.34076/2219-6838-2019-5-50-56
Review
For citations:
Antonov A.Yu., Alekseev V.V., Syrova M.A. Liability for violation of competition rules in entrepreneurial activity: Criminal and administrative aspects. Sociology and Law. 2024;16(4):573-581. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2024-4-573-581