Preview

Sociology and Law

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Artificial intelligence as a subject of law in the context of the theory of anthropocentrism

https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2025-3-437-446

Abstract

The author analyzed various views on artificial intelligence as a subject of law. The issues of its original nature are discussed, and the logic of the transition of the subject of law from the subject of cognition is analyzed. Further, based on the experience of endowing non-human entities with the status of a subject of law, the feasibility of assigning the corresponding status to artificial intelligence is studied. Ultimately, conclusions are made about the prematurity and risks of endowing artificial intelligence with such a status at the current stage of development of social relations.

About the Author

D. M. Gushchin
St. Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics
Russian Federation

Dmitry M. Gushchin – postgraduate student

44a Lermontovsky Ave., St. Petersburg 190020



References

1. Davies C.R. An evolutionary step in intellectual property rights — Artificial intelligence & intellectual property. Computer Law & Security Review. 2011;27(6):601-619. DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2011.09.006

2. Yuan Z. Revisiting the legal personality of AI from the functional perspective. Journal of Shanghai University (Social Science Edition). 2020;37(1):16-26. (In Chin.).

3. Bogdanov E.V. The influence of Léon Duguit’s scientific views on the development of civil law. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law. 2008;(6):32-39. (In Russ.).

4. Didikin A. Legal philosophy of Hans Kelsen: Relativism and causality rethought. Schole. Filosofskoe antikovedenie i klassicheskaya traditsiya = Schole. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition. 2015;9(2):265-282. (In Russ.).

5. Supiot A. Homo Juridicus: Essai sur la fonction anthropologique du Droit. Paris: Éditions du Seuil; 2005. 330 p. (In French).

6. Kelsen H. Reine Rechtslehre. Mit einem Anhang: Das Problem der Gerechtigkeit. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck Verlag; 2017. 921 p. (In German).

7. Burkhanov R.A., Nikulina O.V. Immmanuil Kant᾿s doctrine of law. Vestnik Surgutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Surgut State University Journal. 2021;(4):71-80. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.34822/2312-3419-2021-4-71-80

8. Wen Z., Tong D. Analysis of the legal subject status of artificial intelligence. Beijing Law Review. 2023;14(1):74-86. DOI: 10.4236/blr.2023.141004

9. Shumskaya P.S. Legal presumptions and fictions: Concept, similarities and differences, types, significance for legal practice. In: Karamanukyan D.T., ed. Siberian legal student readings. Proc. 21st Int. sci. conf. of students, dedicated to the 25th anniversary of the Siberian Law University (Omsk, May 19, 2023). Omsk: Siberian Law University; 2024:266-270. (In Russ.).

10. Harari Y.N. Homo Deus: A brief history of tomorrow. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers; 2017. 464 p. (Russ. ed.: Harari Y.N. Homo Deus: kratkaya istoriya budushchego. Moscow: Sindbad; 2022. 492 p.).

11. Guo S.F. The legal construction of the power capacity of artificial intelligence “electronic human”. Gansu Social Sciences. 2019;(4):108-116.


Review

For citations:


Gushchin D.M. Artificial intelligence as a subject of law in the context of the theory of anthropocentrism. Sociology and Law. 2025;17(3):437-446. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2025-3-437-446

Views: 135


ISSN 2219-6242 (Print)