Legal issues of implementing AI technologies in public administration and governance: Russian and international experience
https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2025-3-386-396
Abstract
The article analyzes the legal aspects of implementing artificial intelligence (AI) technologies in public administration and governance, identifies regulatory gaps, and proposes measures to eliminate them. The study objectives include analysis of approaches to legal regulation of AI in public administration in various jurisdictions; identifying key risks and challenges associated with the use of AI by public authorities; comparison of regulatory models for regulating AI in Russia, the United States of America, the European Union (EU), and China. The study is based on the comparative legal method, as well as methods of systemic and functional analysis. It used regulatory legal acts, analytical reports of international organizations (World Bank, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, United Nations Organization), academic publications, and cases from administrative practice. The authors identified differences in approaches to regulating AI, from soft law and selfregulation (USA) to strict regulatory mechanisms with elements of state control (China, EU). Russia is shown to lack comprehensive legislation in the field of AI in public administration, which creates risks of legal uncertainty and a decrease in the level of trust in digital administrative decisions. Ensuring the legality, transparency and responsibility in the use of AI in public administration requires developing a unified regulatory framework that takes into account both international experience and the specifics of the Russian administrative system. According to the article authors, special attention should be paid to the mechanisms of algorithmic accountability, protection of personal data, and observance of the rights of citizens when interacting with AI solutions.
About the Authors
A. V. BunkovRussian Federation
Aleksey V. Bunkov – Head of Department of the Autonomous Non-Commercial Organization «Institute for Internet Development», researcher of the Laboratory of Information Processing and Transmission in Cognitive Systems
19 Bolshoy Karetnyy Ln., bldg. 1, Moscow 127051
D. A. Repin
Russian Federation
Dmitriy A. Repin – Doctor of Social Sciences, Associate Professor, head of the Laboratory of Information Processing and Transmission in Cognitive Systems
19 Bolshoy Karetnyy Ln., bldg. 1, Moscow 127051
P. E. Shchegolev
Russian Federation
Pavel E. Shchegolev – Deputy Director of the Department of Organization of Medical Care and Sanatorium and Resort Affairs
References
1. Local officials in China told to use DeepSeek AI to help them make decisions. South China Morning Post. Feb. 20, 2025. URL: https://www.scmp.com/news/china/politics/article/3299343/local-officials-china-told-use-deepseek-ai-help-them-make-decisions (accessed on 17.06.2025).
2. Repin D.A., Ignatyev S.A. “Implementation impossible to refuse”: The influence of ethics on using artificial intelligence in socio-economic management. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management. 2024;30(12):1503-1509. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.35854/1998-1627-2024-12-1503-1509
3. Lebedev M.A., Repin D.A., Timofeeva M.A. Prospects for the application of neurointerfaces and augmented reality technologies in public administration. Ekonomika i upravlenie = Economics and Management. 2025;31(4):467-474. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.35854/1998-1627-2025-4-467-474
4. Fedorov M.V., Repin D.A., Ignatev S.A. The future of artificial intelligence in public administration: Finding the paradigm of the reasonable (self)limitation. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2024;(5):46-53. (In Russ.).
5. General data protection regulation (GDPR). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016. GDPR.EU. URL: https://gdpr.eu/tag/gdpr/ (accessed on 09.05.2025).
6. Repin D.A., Ignatev S.A. Neurotechnologies in managerial communication: The case of neurointerfaces. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2025;(1):84-90. (In Russ.).
7. Repin D.A., Klevtsova O.Yu. Neurotechnologies in cognitive systems and their impact on the transformation of public administration. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta. 2024;(6):28-34. (In Russ.).
8. Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. Adopted on 23 November 2021. Paris: UNESCO; 2022. 44 p. URL: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137 (accessed on 15.05.2025).
9. Brycheev A.S. Public administration and artificial intelligence: New opportunities for small and medium-sized businesses. Vestnik evraziiskoi nauki = The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2024;16(S5):31. URL: https://esj.today/PDF/31FAVN524.pdf (accessed on 21.05.2025). (In Russ.).
10. Fedorov M.V. Socio-economic aspects of the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies. Journal of Digital Economy Research. 2023;1(1):6-60. DOI: 10.24833/14511791-2023-1-6-60
Review
For citations:
Bunkov A.V., Repin D.A., Shchegolev P.E. Legal issues of implementing AI technologies in public administration and governance: Russian and international experience. Sociology and Law. 2025;17(3):386-396. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2025-3-386-396
JATS XML



















