Preview

Sociology and Law

Advanced search
Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Theoretical grounds and procedural arrangements for strengthening the accusation in criminal proceedings

https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2025-3-415-421

Abstract

The article examines issues relevant to criminal proceedings, related to the need for legislative consolidation of the grounds and procedural arrangements for changing the charges towards their strengthening. It is argued that the current provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (CPC RF) provide for mandatory registration of any changes to the charges in an independent procedural act which content must be promptly communicated to the accused at the stage before the completion of the preliminary investigation. The author proposes to distinguish between two procedures for changing the charges, namely a simplified one that does not require re-filing the charges, and a more complex one that involves issuing a new ruling and performing the envisaged procedures. Particular attention is paid to the problem of strengthening the accusation at the trial stage. In this regard, an idea is proposed to expand the powers of the public prosecutor. The prosecution attorney then receives the right to file a written motion to change the charges to graver ones during the court hearing, and the court, without returning the case to the prosecutor, announces a recess to formulate a new charge and give the defense time to prepare its position. The main objective of the study is to determine the grounds and procedural arrangements for changing the charges to graver ones at the preliminary investigation stage and during the consideration of the case by the court, as well as to ensure the accused the right to defense, to comply with procedural time limits, and to ensure the adversarial nature of the parties.

About the Author

A. Yu. Belousova
Second Court of Cassation of General Jurisdiction
Russian Federation

Arina Yu. Belousova – Master of Law; Assistant Judge of the Second Court of Cassation of General Jurisdiction

29 Vereyskaya St., bldg. 1, Moscow 121357



References

1. Isaenko V.N. Aims, tasks and essence of a state case. Vestnik Akademii General’noi prokuratury Rossiiskoi Federatsii = Bulletin of the Academy of the Prosecutor General’s Office of the Russian Federation. 2010;(6):23-29. (In Russ.).

2. Criminal procedure code of the Russian Federation. Federal law of December 18, 2001 No. 174-FZ (as amended on August 2, 2019). Garant. ru. URL: https://base.garant.ru/12125178/ (accessed on 19.08.2025). (In Russ.).

3. Strogovich M.S. Material truth and judicial evidence in Soviet criminal proceedings. Moscow: USSR Academy od Sciences Publ.; 1955. 384 p. (In Russ.).

4. Burmagin S.V. Separation of prosecutor and judicial powers in criminal proceedings in Russia: From the judicial reform of 1864 to the present day. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2014;(5):885-896. (In Russ.).

5. Lupinskaya P.A. Decisions in criminal proceedings: Theory, legislation, practice. 2nd ed. Moscow: Norma, Infra-M; 2010. 238 p. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Belousova A.Yu. Theoretical grounds and procedural arrangements for strengthening the accusation in criminal proceedings. Sociology and Law. 2025;17(3):415-421. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/2219-6242-2025-3-415-421

Views: 110

JATS XML

ISSN 2219-6242 (Print)